![]() ![]() Lamont struck back with an ad produced by political consultant Bill Hillsman, in which a narrator says, "Meet Ned Lamont. Lieberman released several campaign advertisements over the summer seeking to connect himself to former President Bill Clinton and to portray Lamont as standing for little more than opposition to Lieberman. A controversy about a "kiss" Lieberman supposedly received from Bush during the 2005 State of the Union address highlighted concerns that he was too close to Bush to be a credible Democratic nominee. Įarly polling showed Lieberman with as much as a 46-point lead, but subsequent polls showed Lamont gaining until he took the lead just weeks before the primary. They think in simple slogans and refuse to tolerate any ideological dissent. These are exactly the sorts of fanatics who tore the party apart in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It's a test of strength for the new breed of left-wing activists who are flexing their muscles within the party. What's holding me back is that the anti-Lieberman campaign has come to stand for much more than Lieberman's sins. I can't quite root for Lieberman to lose his primary. The New Republic senior editor and "liberal hawk" Jonathan Chait, who was critical of Lieberman on a variety of issues, wrote: He was more liberal than Lieberman, but he was not immune to criticism from within his party. On March 13, 2006, Lamont announced his candidacy. Lieberman was criticized for a lack of commitment to the Democratic Party, opposition to affirmative action his opposition to a Connecticut state law that would require Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims, his membership in the bipartisan Gang of 14, his support of Florida Governor Jeb Bush's involvement in the Terri Schiavo case, his initial willingness to compromise on Social Security privatization, alliances with Republicans and his attacks on other Democrats. Senator and Democratic nominee for vice president in 2000īecause Connecticut was believed to be a Democratic stronghold, political analysts considered its Senate seat safe to remain Democratic, but Lieberman's continued support for conservative and Bush administration policies made him vulnerable to a Democratic primary challenger. The Democratic Party primary pitted Lieberman against Lamont. The primary elections were held on August 8. As of 2023, this is the most recent statewide election in Connecticut not won by a Democrat. ![]() He ran again in 2018, winning both the primary and the general election. Lamont ran for governor in 2010, losing in the primary to eventual two-term governor Dannel Malloy. He continued to caucus with the Democrats, and was listed in the Senate records as an Independent Democrat. Lieberman raised more than double what Lamont did during the campaign, and won the general election. Most polls had Lieberman defeating Lamont. He was not a member of this party, remaining a registered Democrat throughout the campaign. ![]() ![]() The Republicans nominated Alan Schlesinger, the former mayor of Derby, whose campaign was marred by allegations of inappropriate gambling activities.Īfter losing the primary, Lieberman ran as a third-party candidate with the newly formed Connecticut for Lieberman party. Lieberman had been seen as vulnerable to a primary challenge due to his conservative positions and support for the Iraq War, and Lamont ran as an antiwar challenger, receiving support from the left of the party. Lieberman originally ran as a Democrat, but lost the August 8 Democratic primary to former Greenwich selectman and businessman Ned Lamont. Senator Joe Lieberman won his fourth and final term in the Senate, under the Connecticut for Lieberman party banner. The 2006 United States Senate election in Connecticut was held November 7, 2006. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |